What if the biggest thing holding your business back isn’t a lack of strategy but the very system you’ve been taught to rely on?
In this episode, I’m diving into the concept of the Ozempic economy in online business, a cultural pattern where we’re sold fast relief from discomfort instead of real, lasting solutions, and how it’s shaping the online business world.
From constant optimization to the promise of instant results, this model keeps entrepreneurs stuck in cycles of dependency, always chasing the next fix.
I’m sharing how this dynamic played out in my own business, how I spent years investing in strategies, scaling systems, and chasing milestones that looked successful but felt completely misaligned. Plus, I’m sharing what changed when I stepped out of that cycle.
If your business has been feeling heavier, more complicated, or less like you, this conversation will challenge how you think about growth and show you why your next level might come from doing less, not more.
Or listen and subscribe for free on your favorite app: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube Music
Something has felt off in the online business space for a while now, and it took me longer than I’d like to admit to actually name what it was.
From the outside, a lot of things look like they’re working. People are making money, there’s no shortage of strategies to try, and it’s easier than ever to find support. On paper, that should make building a business feel more straightforward.
That hasn’t been the experience for a lot of people.
What I’ve been seeing, both in my own business and in conversations with clients, is this underlying friction that doesn’t really go away, even when the numbers are fine.
It shows up as a lack of excitement, or a sense that everything requires more effort than it should, or a feeling that the business has slowly drifted into something you didn’t actually mean to build.
Most of the time, that gets interpreted as a sign that something needs to be fixed.
So the instinct is to look for a better approach.
That’s the part I think is worth questioning.
Because there’s another possibility that doesn’t get talked about as much, and it’s a lot less convenient.
Sometimes the issue isn’t that something is missing. Sometimes it’s that you’ve been operating inside a structure that was never a good fit, and you’ve been trying to improve it instead of noticing that.
This is where the idea of the Ozempic economy in online business becomes useful.
I came across this idea through a Substack article by Kyla Scanlon, and it immediately reframed a lot of what I had been noticing but hadn’t fully articulated. In it, she breaks down what she calls the “Ozempicization of the Economy.”
Her argument is about the broader economy, not just business coaching, but the pattern translates almost directly.
There’s a growing tendency to treat discomfort as something that should be removed as quickly as possible. The focus shifts away from understanding what’s creating the problem and toward finding a way to stop feeling it.
That becomes the value being sold.
Relief, speed, and the promise that you don’t have to change much to get a different result.
Once you start looking at business through that lens, a lot of things that seemed normal start to look very different.
It usually starts with something small.
Revenue dips a bit. Engagement isn’t what it used to be. You feel less motivated to show up.
None of those things are unusual on their own, but the way they get interpreted tends to follow a predictable path.
There must be a problem.
The problem must have a solution.
The solution is something you don’t currently have.
That last step is where the pattern locks in.
Because now the next move feels obvious. You go find the missing piece.
What often doesn’t happen is a pause long enough to ask whether the structure you’re working inside actually makes sense.
Instead, the focus stays on improving it.
That’s how people end up layering new strategies onto something they never really evaluated in the first place.
At the beginning, that can feel productive. You’re taking action, trying new things, staying engaged.
After a while, the business starts to feel harder to navigate.
There are more moving parts, more decisions to make, and less clarity about what is actually driving results.
There’s a reason this doesn’t correct itself.
Adding something new is easy to package and easy to sell. It gives people a clear next step and a sense that progress is happening.
Stepping back and questioning whether the current direction is even right doesn’t offer the same immediate payoff. It requires a level of uncertainty that most marketing is designed to avoid.
So the conversation stays focused on improvement.
Better systems, better messaging, better offers.
All of that has a place, but it only works if the foundation it’s being applied to is solid.
If it’s not, you can keep refining indefinitely without getting to a point where things actually feel aligned.
Over time, this creates a subtle shift in how decisions get made.
Instead of evaluating what makes sense based on your own business, it becomes more natural to look outward first.
Someone else has already figured this out.
There’s a method that works.
There’s a framework that will get you there faster.
None of that is inherently wrong. Learning from other people is part of building anything.
The issue is what happens when that becomes the default.
If every problem points you back to something external, you don’t get much practice making decisions from your own perspective.
That’s where things start to feel unstable, even if there’s growth happening on the surface.
I built a version of my business that made sense according to the standards I was surrounded by.
There was a clear goal, which was hitting a certain revenue milestone, and there was a fairly established path for how to get there.
That path involved scaling offers, building out a team, and creating enough structure that the business could operate without me being deeply involved in the day-to-day.
I followed that path pretty closely.
For a while, it worked in the way you would expect. Revenue increased. The business became more complex. There were more systems in place, more people involved, more moving parts overall.
At the same time, the experience of running it changed.
It became more operational than creative. My time shifted toward managing things that I hadn’t originally built the business to manage. The work itself felt further away from what I actually enjoy doing.
I didn’t question the direction right away. I assumed it was something that could be improved.
So I stayed focused on making it run better.
There’s a point where refinement stops helping.
It’s not always obvious when you cross that line, because the changes you’re making are still logical.
You’re improving systems, adjusting processes, and trying to make things more efficient.
But the underlying experience doesn’t change in a meaningful way.
That’s usually the signal.
If the effort to improve something keeps increasing and the return on that effort doesn’t shift, it’s worth asking whether the problem is actually what you think it is.
In my case, it became clear that I wasn’t dealing with something that needed to be tuned.
I was dealing with something that didn’t fit.
By the time you realize that, you’ve already invested quite a bit.
There’s the financial side, but that’s only part of it.
There’s also the time you’ve spent building, the decisions you’ve made along the way, and the identity that gets tied up in what you’ve created.
Letting go of any part of that doesn’t feel neutral.
It can feel like undoing progress.
That’s what keeps a lot of people in place longer than they want to be.
It’s not that they don’t see the issue. It’s that changing direction feels like it comes with a cost they’d rather avoid.
The shift didn’t come from finding a better way to scale what I had already built.
It came from stepping out of that line of thinking entirely.
Instead of looking for improvements, I started looking at what no longer made sense to keep.
That led to a series of decisions that would have been difficult to justify if I was only looking at revenue.
Some offers came off the table. Parts of the structure that had taken a long time to build were no longer necessary. The overall shape of the business became simpler.
What replaced it wasn’t something new in the traditional sense.
It was a return to the parts that had worked from the beginning, without all the added layers.
When you take things away, it changes what you’re able to see.
Without as much complexity, it’s easier to identify what’s actually driving results and what was just adding noise.
In my case, the work that remained was the work I tend to do best.
There was more space for direct client interaction, and less time spent managing systems that didn’t need to exist in the first place. The structure supported the way I like to work instead of pulling me away from it.
The business didn’t fall apart when it became simpler.
If anything, it became easier to sustain.
If you’re operating inside the Ozempic economy in online business, growth almost always gets framed as expansion.
More offers, more strategies, more tools.
There are times when that makes sense, but it’s not the only path.
There are also times when growth comes from narrowing the focus and removing what isn’t contributing.
That approach doesn’t create the same immediate sense of momentum, but it tends to lead to something more stable.
Opting out of this pattern doesn’t mean you stop learning or stop investing in your business.
It changes how you interpret the signals you’re getting.
When something feels off, the first question doesn’t have to be about what you need to add.
It can be about whether the current structure still fits.
That question doesn’t always have a quick answer, and it doesn’t always lead to an easy decision.
It does tend to lead to a more honest one.
Design a profitable practice that honors your natural wiring so you can grow without the burnout. Explore coaching programs built for who you are.
If your business has been feeling harder than it should, there’s a good chance the answer isn’t another layer.
Before you go looking for something new, it’s worth taking a closer look at what’s already there.
Not everything needs to be fixed.
Some things need to be let go.
Ready to trade the “quick fix” addiction for a business that finally feels like yours?
Take the “What’s Your CEO Type?” Quiz to identify your natural leadership style so you can strip away the external pressure and run your business with less friction.
This post may contain affiliate links. If you click on a link and make a purchase, I may receive a small commission.

Most business advice assumes everyone should sell, lead, and grow the same way. They shouldn’t.
Your CEO Type helps you see where you create the most value, how you make decisions, and which work fits you best.
The goal isn’t to remove you from the business. It’s to keep you focused on the work where your expertise matters most and build the rest on purpose, so growth doesn’t require more of your time.
Take the free quiz to discover your CEO Type, your natural strengths, and where your business might be asking too much of you.


I'm a strategic advisor and diagnostic thinker obsessed with helping established coaches and experts build businesses that actually fit who they are, so they can keep more of what they earn and stop swimming against the current in their own business.
Glad you're here.